Summative Evaluation of the National Arts Training Contribution Program
Corporate Review Branch
Canadian Heritage
May 2007
Final Report
- Acronyms and Abbreviations
- Executive Summary
- 1. NATCP Program Description
- 1.1 Program Background
- 1.2 Objectives, Intended Outcomes and Funding Criteria
- 1.1 Program Background
- 1.2.1 Objectives and Intended Outcomes
- 1.2.2 Governance Structure and Program Resources
- 1.2.3 Application Process
- 1.2.4 Funded Institutions
- 1.3 Evaluation Issues and Objectives
- 1.4 Organization of the Report
- 2. Evaluation Issues and Methods
- 2.1 Key Informant and Expert Interviews
- 2.2 Review of Program Documentation
- 2.3 Review of Files and Survey Databases
- 2.4 Literature Review
- 2.5 Web Survey of Graduates
- 2.6 Data Quality and Limitations of the Evaluation
- 2.1 Key Informant and Expert Interviews
- 3. Program Relevance
- 3.1 Need for Federal Involvement
- 3.2 Roles of Partners/Stakeholders
- 3.1 Need for Federal Involvement
- 3.2.1 Provincial Governments
- 3.2.2 Universities/Colleges
- 3.2.3 Private Sector
- 3.2.4 Non-Profit Organizations
- 3.2.5 Federal Roles That Could Be Transferred
- 3.3 Training Needs and Gaps
- 3.4 Consistency of NATCP with Government Objectives
- 3.5 Conclusions
- 4. Success and Impacts
- 4.1 Resource Stability
- 4.1 Resource Stability
- 4.1.1 Financial Situation
- 4.1.2 Additional Sources of Funding
- 4.1.3 Adequacy of Resources
- 4.1.4 Number and Ratio of Students Accepted
- 4.2 Diverse, Nationally Significant Training
- 4.2.1 Faculty Qualifications
- 4.2.2 National and International Recognition
- 4.2.3 Collaborative Projects
- 4.3 Success and Satisfaction of Graduates
- 4.3.1 Honours, Distinctions and Awards of Graduates
- 4.3.2 Leadership Roles Played by Graduates
- 4.3.3 Extent to Which Graduates are Working Professionally
- 4.3.4 Satisfaction of Graduates
- 4.4 Cultural Diversity
- 4.4.1 Graduates by Type of Training
- 4.4.2 Graduates by Regional, Linguistic and Ethnic Backgrounds
- 4.4.3 Outreach and Recruitment
- 4.4.4 Views on NATCP Approach to Cultural Diversity
- 4.4.1 Graduates by Type of Training
- 4.5 Achievement of Long-Term Outcomes
- 4.6 Conclusions
- 5. Cost-Effectiveness / Alternatives
- 5.1 Cost of NATCP per Graduate and Cost of Similar Programs
- 5.2 Foreign Students
- 5.3 Alternative Approaches
- 5.4 Sustainability
- 5.5 Selection Criteria
- 5.6 NATCP and NTPFVS
- 5.7 Conclusions
- 5.1 Cost of NATCP per Graduate and Cost of Similar Programs
- 6. Overall Conclusions, Recommendations and Management Response
- 6.1 Relevance
- 6.2 Success
- 6.3 Cost-Effectiveness
- 6.4 Recommendations and Management Response
- 6.1 Relevance
- Appendix A: Comparative Chart of NATCP Objectives and Expected Results
- Appendix B: List of Institutions Funded by NATCP
- Appendix C: Evaluation Matrix
- Appendix D: Interview Guides
- Appendix E: List of Documents Reviewed
- Appendix F: Survey Questionnaire
- Appendix G: Sources and Amounts of Funding to Institutions, 2002-03 to 2005-06
- Appendix H: Staff Awards 2002-2005
- Appendix I: Cost per Graduate
- Appendix J: Similarities between NATCP and NTPFV
Note:
To access the Portable Document Format (PDF) version you must have a PDF reader installed. If you do not already have such a reader, there are numerous PDF readers available for free download or for purchase on the Internet:
Please note that all saveable and fillable PDF forms require Adobe Acrobat Reader version 8.1 or higher.